Editors Reads Verdict
Christie spins one of her cleverest later puzzles from a single careless sentence at a family gathering. When the woman who suggested murder is herself slaughtered, Poirot goes undercover among the heirs, threading a brilliant misdirection to a richly satisfying reveal.
What We Loved
- A superb central misdirection
- Tight, fairly clued family puzzle
- Poirot working partly undercover
- One of the strongest later Poirot novels
Minor Drawbacks
- Large inheritance-hungry cast to track
- Poirot enters somewhat late
Key Takeaways
- → A careless remark at a funeral triggers a second murder
- → Poirot investigates partly under an assumed identity
- → Built on one of Christie's most elegant misdirections
- → A houseful of heirs supplies abundant motive
| Author | Agatha Christie |
|---|---|
| Publisher | William Morrow Paperbacks |
| Pages | 304 |
| Published | June 14, 2011 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Mystery, Crime Fiction, Classic |
| Difficulty | Beginner |
| Best For | Whodunit lovers who relish a fairly clued family mystery built on a single, brilliant piece of misdirection. |
How After the Funeral Compares
After the Funeral at a glance against 3 similar books readers weigh alongside it.
| Book | Author | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| After the Funeral (this book) | Agatha Christie | ★ 4.2 | Whodunit lovers who relish a fairly clued family mystery built on a single, |
| Crooked House | Agatha Christie | ★ 4.4 | Mystery |
| Five Little Pigs | Agatha Christie | ★ 4.5 | Mystery |
| The Murder of Roger Ackroyd | Agatha Christie | ★ 4.5 | Any mystery reader |
A Careless Word at a Funeral
After the Funeral — published in some editions as Funerals Are Fatal — is one of the most admired of Agatha Christie’s later Poirot novels, and a textbook example of her genius for misdirection. The entire plot springs from a single sentence spoken at a moment of high emotion, a remark so casual that everyone present tries at once to forget it, and so dangerous that it costs the speaker her life.
The Abernethie family has gathered for the funeral of Richard Abernethie, the wealthy head of the clan, who has died after a brief illness. His fortune is to be divided among his surviving relatives, a collection of nieces, nephews, in-laws and dependants who have come together more in expectation than in grief. As the family lawyer prepares to read the will, Richard’s eccentric, vague younger sister Cora Lansquenet pipes up with an unforgettable line: “But he was murdered, wasn’t he?” The room freezes; Cora, flustered, hastily takes it back; and everyone agrees, with relief, to put the embarrassing outburst out of mind.
The Remark That Kills
The next day Cora Lansquenet is found in her cottage, hacked to death with a hatchet. Suddenly her foolish question takes on a terrible significance. If Richard Abernethie really was murdered, then Cora may have stumbled onto the truth — and been silenced for it. If he died naturally, then her killing must be a separate horror, perhaps a burglary gone wrong. The family lawyer, Mr. Entwhistle, cannot rest until he knows which it is, and it is he who brings the problem to Hercule Poirot.
This is the elegant engine of the book: a death everyone had accepted as natural, retrospectively cast into doubt by the violent death of the one person who questioned it. Was Cora right, and her brother murdered? Or was her remark merely the random noise of a scatterbrained woman, seized upon by some unrelated killer as cover? Christie keeps both possibilities alive with consummate skill, and the reader, like Poirot, must decide which thread to pull.
Poirot Among the Heirs
To investigate, Poirot adopts a sly stratagem, presenting himself to the assembled family under a pretext that lets him observe them at close quarters as they squabble over furniture, jewellery and money. The Abernethies are a finely drawn gallery of suspects: the dapper nephew with debts, the actress wife with ambitions, the bitter relations who feel cheated, the quiet companion who saw more than anyone realised. Each had something to gain from Richard’s death and something to fear from any reopening of the question, and Christie distributes motive and opportunity among them with her usual fairness.
The pleasure of the middle of the book lies in watching Poirot sift through these greedy, grieving, dissembling relatives, attending to the small inconsistencies that everyone else overlooks. A remark about a painting, a detail of who sat where, a question of what Cora actually said and how she said it — from such fragments he begins to assemble the truth.
The Brilliance of the Misdirection
Without giving anything away, it can be said that After the Funeral turns on one of the cleverest pieces of misdirection in Christie’s entire output. The clue to the whole affair is hidden in plain sight, spoken aloud and dismissed within the first chapters, and the reader who grasps its significance will solve the case; the vast majority do not, and feel the delicious sting of recognition when Poirot lays it bare. It is the kind of solution that sends readers flipping back through the pages to confirm that, yes, the answer was there all along, perfectly fair and perfectly concealed.
This is Christie at the height of her craftsmanship. By 1953 she had been writing detective fiction for more than three decades, and the assurance shows: the plot is tight, the clueing immaculate, the suspects vivid, and the central trick worthy of her very best. There is nothing baggy or perfunctory about it; every scene earns its place.
Its Place in the Canon
After the Funeral is widely regarded as one of the strongest Poirot novels of the post-war period, often grouped with Mrs McGinty’s Dead and A Murder Is Announced as evidence that Christie’s powers remained undimmed well into her later career. It has been adapted for television, and its central conceit — the dangerous offhand remark, the death that turns out not to have been natural after all — has been imitated many times since.
For newcomers it works beautifully as a standalone and offers a perfect demonstration of the fair-play mystery, in which the author hides everything the reader needs and still manages to fool them. For devotees it is a connoisseur’s favourite, the kind of book that rewards rereading precisely because, once you know the answer, you can admire the sheer audacity with which it was concealed.
Beyond the puzzle, the novel offers a sharp, slightly mordant portrait of a family in the grip of expectation. Christie was always shrewd about money and the way it warps affection, and the Abernethies, gathered to divide a fortune, give her ample scope for that observation. The polite mourning that barely masks naked greed, the careful calculation of who deserves what, the resentments that surface the moment the will is read — all of it is rendered with a dry, knowing wit. The result is a mystery that entertains on the level of social comedy even as it tightens, chapter by chapter, into a remorseless trap.
It is also a fine showcase for the patient, observant side of Poirot’s method. Denied a fresh crime scene and confronted instead with a death already explained away and a family closing ranks, he must work almost entirely by listening — to what people say, to what they conspicuously avoid saying, and to the small discrepancies between one account and another. His genius here is less the flourish of deduction than the quiet refusal to accept the obvious, the insistence on returning again and again to that single careless remark until it yields its secret. For readers who enjoy watching a great detective think rather than dash about, After the Funeral is among the most rewarding cases in the entire sequence.
Our rating: 4.2/5 — A beautifully constructed later Poirot with one of Christie’s finest misdirections; tight, fair, and immensely satisfying when the trick is finally revealed.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "After the Funeral" about?
After a wealthy man's funeral, his scatty younger sister blurts out that he was murdered — and the next day she is brutally killed herself. Was her remark idle nonsense, or did it sign her death warrant? Hercule Poirot infiltrates the grieving family to find out.
Who should read "After the Funeral"?
Whodunit lovers who relish a fairly clued family mystery built on a single, brilliant piece of misdirection.
What are the key takeaways from "After the Funeral"?
A careless remark at a funeral triggers a second murder Poirot investigates partly under an assumed identity Built on one of Christie's most elegant misdirections A houseful of heirs supplies abundant motive
Is "After the Funeral" worth reading?
Christie spins one of her cleverest later puzzles from a single careless sentence at a family gathering. When the woman who suggested murder is herself slaughtered, Poirot goes undercover among the heirs, threading a brilliant misdirection to a richly satisfying reveal.
Ready to Read After the Funeral?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: