The Marriage Plot

The Thesis

Madeleine Hanna is writing a senior thesis on the marriage plot — the formal structure of the Victorian novel in which the narrative question is who the heroine will marry and the answer determines the story’s meaning. She has been reading Roland Barthes and is being taught, by the semiotics seminars Brown is offering in 1982, that this form is exhausted, that the readerly pleasure it provides is ideological, that the text has displaced the author. She finds this convincing intellectually and irrelevant personally, because she is in love with Leonard Bankhead and cannot reason herself out of it.

Leonard Bankhead is the most interesting person at Brown, which is a place full of interesting people. He is also, it becomes clear gradually and then all at once, bipolar. Mitchell Grammaticus has been in love with Madeleine for three years, knows she does not return it, and leaves for India and a study of comparative religion when graduation arrives.

The Argument About Form

Eugenides is using the campus setting to stage a genuine argument: the marriage plot is dead as a literary form, but its emotional structure — the hope that the right union will resolve the central question of your life — is still very much alive in the people who have been taught that it is dead. Madeleine lives the plot her thesis is dismantling. Mitchell lives the counter-plot (religion, self-denial, removal from the narrative). Leonard is the one who cannot live any plot for long enough to reach an ending.

The novel does not resolve the argument so much as embody it.

A Period Piece in Semiotics

Part of the novel’s pleasure is how precisely it captures a specific intellectual moment: the early-1980s American campus, where French theory had just arrived and the brightest students were learning to talk about the “death of the author” and the instability of meaning with the fervor of new converts. Eugenides, a Brown graduate of exactly this era, writes the semiotics seminar with affectionate satire — the posturing, the jargon, the thrilling sense that everything you loved about reading was naïve and everything difficult was profound. Madeleine’s discomfort in that room, her stubborn attachment to Austen and Eliot in a climate that found such pleasures suspect, is the comic engine of the early chapters. The period detail never feels like nostalgia for its own sake; it is the precise setting in which a young woman could be taught that the marriage plot is dead and still find herself living one.

The Triangle, Rewired

The oldest machinery in fiction — two men, one woman — is what Eugenides deliberately runs through a contemporary circuit. Madeleine is pulled between Leonard, the magnetic biologist she cannot reason herself away from no matter how much theory she absorbs, and Mitchell, who has decided with the quiet certainty of the unrequited that he is the man she is supposed to marry. The pleasure and frustration of the book is that it keeps promising the satisfactions the setup implies — the wrong choice corrected, the steady suitor rewarded — and then declines to deliver them on schedule. Eugenides is interested precisely in the gap between the story we have been trained to expect and the messier outcomes real attachment produces. Madeleine does not love the person who loves her most reliably, and the novel refuses to pretend she should.

Living Inside an Illness

The portrait of Leonard’s bipolar disorder is the book’s most widely praised achievement, and deservedly so. Eugenides writes the texture of the illness from the inside: the lithium that steadies the mania but also flattens affect, dulls thought, thickens the body and the tongue; the secret dose-tampering by which Leonard tries to reclaim his sharpness and instead courts collapse; the exhausting labor of loving someone whose chemistry can turn the relationship into a hospital ward overnight. Many early readers assumed Leonard was a thinly veiled portrait of David Foster Wallace — the bandana, the chewing tobacco, the intimidating brilliance — an identification Eugenides has consistently rejected. Whatever its origins, the character is rendered with a clinical accuracy and human warmth that resists the genre’s habit of romanticizing mental illness as the price of genius. Leonard’s mind is not a gift with a dark side; it is an illness with costs, and the people around him pay them too.

The Anti-Ending

The marriage plot demands a wedding, and Eugenides withholds it in the most pointed way available to him. Mitchell finally achieves the thing he has wanted for four years — he sleeps with Madeleine — and the experience is hollow, leaving him not heartbroken but bewildered, lonelier than before. Then he does the single most un-Victorian thing the novel can offer: standing in for the author, he effectively releases her. Rather than claim the heroine, he asks aloud whether a man who truly loved a woman might want her to be free rather than married, and lets her go. The form that exists to deliver a husband ends instead with a man granting the heroine permission to need none. It is the argument of Madeleine’s thesis, dramatized in her own life.

The Bottom Line

The Marriage Plot is the most approachable of Eugenides’s three novels and, for some readers, the most quietly subversive. It takes a dead literary form seriously enough to both mourn and dismantle it, and it grounds an essentially academic argument in three young people vivid enough to carry it. Its flaws are real — Madeleine is less compelling than the men who orbit her, and the semiotics scaffolding sometimes muffles the human drama it is meant to frame — but the novel’s intelligence is never merely decorative. It is a campus romance that knows exactly why campus romances no longer end the way they used to, and is honest enough to end accordingly.

Our rating: 3.9/5 — Eugenides’s most accessible novel: an intelligent campus romance that uses literary theory as more than window dressing.

Reading Guides

• Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides — Full Review