Editors Reads Verdict
Emily Brontë's only novel is one of the strangest and most powerful in the English language — a gothic romance that refuses the consolations of romance, a love story populated by characters who are almost entirely incapable of love in any conventional sense. Its raw, elemental force is unlike anything else.
What We Loved
- The Yorkshire moors as a character — Brontë's landscape writing is among the finest in English
- Heathcliff is one of literature's great anti-heroes: genuinely frightening, genuinely fascinating
- The nested narrative structure (Nelly telling Lockwood) creates layers of unreliable perspective
- Refuses sentimentalisation — the love it depicts is consuming, destructive, and real
Minor Drawbacks
- Almost every character is morally repellent; readers seeking sympathetic heroes will struggle
- The time-jumping structure can be disorienting on first reading
- The second generation's story is considerably less gripping than the first
Key Takeaways
- → Passion without moral foundation becomes possession and ultimately destruction
- → Class resentment and social exclusion can warp character beyond recognition
- → The second generation repeats the sins of the first — history cycles unless actively interrupted
- → Love and hatred can be so intertwined as to be indistinguishable
- → Nature — wild, indifferent, beautiful — mirrors and magnifies the novel's emotional extremes
| Author | Emily Brontë |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Penguin Classics |
| Pages | 348 |
| Published | December 19, 1847 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Fiction, Classic Literature, Gothic |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers prepared for a challenging, unsettling novel that defies genre categorisation — not a conventional romance but an elemental study in obsession and revenge. |
The Novel That Shouldn’t Work — But Does
Wuthering Heights is, by almost any conventional standard, a novel that should not succeed. Its central characters are selfish, cruel, and frequently monstrous. Its protagonist — if Heathcliff can be called that — spends roughly half the novel executing a methodical revenge against two families whose only crime was to expose him to humiliation. The narrative is delivered by a housekeeper to a baffled London visitor, a framing device that keeps us perpetually at a remove from the events it describes. And yet the novel is one of the most viscerally compelling things in English literature, impossible to put down and impossible to forget.
Emily Brontë published it in 1847 — the same year as her sister Charlotte’s Jane Eyre — and died a year later, aged thirty. Wuthering Heights is the only novel she wrote.
The Love That Consumes
The relationship between Heathcliff — a foundling of unknown origin taken in by the Earnshaw family — and Catherine Earnshaw is not a love story in any comfortable sense. It is a study in mutual identification so total that the self dissolves: “I am Heathcliff,” Catherine famously declares, and she means it as a statement of ontological fact, not romantic hyperbole. When social forces separate them — Catherine chooses the gentle, wealthy Edgar Linton over the now-degraded Heathcliff — the severing is experienced by both as a kind of death.
Heathcliff’s response is the novel’s dark engine: he disappears for three years and returns wealthy, mysterious, and consumed by a plan of revenge so patient and thorough that it extends across two generations and encompasses the ruin of everyone associated with his humiliation.
Brontë’s Gothic Landscape
The Yorkshire moors are not merely setting but moral weather in Wuthering Heights. Brontë’s landscapes — bleak, magnificent, inhospitable, sublime — embody the psychological states of her characters with an economy that is almost poetic. The two houses of the novel, the exposed and brutish Wuthering Heights and the sheltered, comfortable Thrushcross Grange, represent competing ways of being in the world, and the novel is partly about which mode of being is more honest about what life actually is.
Structure and Unreliability
The double narrative frame — Lockwood narrating Nelly Dean’s account of events decades old — is one of Victorian fiction’s cleverest structural decisions. Nelly is an interested party, not a neutral observer, and her judgements are systematically untrustworthy. The novel invites us to read against her, to hear in her rationalisations the self-serving story of someone who shaped events more than she admits.
This unreliability is not a flaw but the novel’s point: love of Heathcliff’s intensity, violence of his kind, cannot be adequately narrated from outside.
Our rating: 4.5/5 — Genuinely wild and genuinely great; the Victorian novel that most resembles a force of nature.
Ready to Read Wuthering Heights?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: