Editors Reads Verdict
The third volume of the best hard science fiction trilogy of the twentieth century — less propulsive than Red Mars but richer in its political and philosophical payoff. The treatment of extreme longevity and its psychological effects is the trilogy's most unexpected achievement.
What We Loved
- The political vision — multiple competing visions of how a new world should be governed — is the most sophisticated in science fiction
- The treatment of extreme longevity is psychologically rigorous in ways most fiction avoids
- The geological and ecological detail continues at the level of the previous volumes
Minor Drawbacks
- Less dramatically propulsive than Red Mars — the conflicts are more diffuse
- Some readers find the philosophical passages on memory and ageing slow
Key Takeaways
- → Terraforming raises unanswerable political questions — who owns a planet, and who has the right to transform it
- → Longevity beyond a few centuries produces psychological fragmentation — the self cannot hold that much time coherently
- → The green and red Mars factions represent a genuine conflict between ecological preservation and human expansion that has no clean resolution
| Author | Kim Stanley Robinson |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Bantam |
| Pages | 760 |
| Published | January 1, 1996 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Science Fiction |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers who have completed Red Mars and Green Mars — the trilogy's conclusion and resolution. |
How Blue Mars Compares
Blue Mars at a glance against 3 similar books readers weigh alongside it.
| Book | Author | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Mars (this book) | Kim Stanley Robinson | ★ 4.2 | Readers who have completed Red Mars and Green Mars — the trilogy's conclusion |
| Green Mars | Kim Stanley Robinson | ★ 4.1 | Science Fiction |
| Red Mars | Kim Stanley Robinson | ★ 4.1 | Hard science fiction readers willing to invest in a dense, politically |
| The Dispossessed | Ursula K. Le Guin | ★ 4.4 | Serious science fiction readers interested in political philosophy, utopian |
The Blue Planet
Mars is blue now. The terraforming project that began in Red Mars and continued through Green Mars has succeeded — the planet has an atmosphere, liquid water, a sky. The original colonists, kept alive by longevity treatment, are now centuries old. The planet they transformed has become something neither they nor their creators fully envisaged.
Robinson’s trilogy is the most sustained engagement with planetary-scale ecological change in science fiction. Blue Mars asks the long-term questions: what happens to politics when the crisis is over? What happens to people when they have lived too long to maintain coherent identity?
The Memory Problem
The most unexpected achievement of the final volume is its treatment of memory. People who have lived for two centuries cannot retain it all — the early memories fade, leaving people uncertain who they were and therefore who they are. Robinson treats this as a psychological problem with no technical solution, and it gives the final volume a melancholy that the more dramatic earlier volumes lack.
What Distinguishes This Book
Among the qualities that set Blue Mars apart: The political vision — multiple competing visions of how a new world should be governed — is the most sophisticated in science fiction; The treatment of extreme longevity is psychologically rigorous in ways most fiction avoids; and The geological and ecological detail continues at the level of the previous volumes. These strengths are evident from the first pages and sustain across the whole work.
Themes
The thematic concerns of Blue Mars give it weight beyond its surface narrative. Terraforming raises unanswerable political questions — who owns a planet, and who has the right to transform it. Longevity beyond a few centuries produces psychological fragmentation — the self cannot hold that much time coherently. The green and red Mars factions represent a genuine conflict between ecological preservation and human expansion that has no clean resolution. These ideas emerge from the texture of the work rather than explicit statement, which is the mark of ambitious fiction done well.
Series Context
By 3 in the series, Kim Stanley Robinson has built enough world and character depth to sustain a story that would be impossible in a standalone. The accumulated reader investment pays off here: stakes feel genuine because the world feels real. The book does what good middle-series entries must — it satisfies on its own terms while clearly advancing toward a larger conclusion.
Limitations
Less dramatically propulsive than Red Mars — the conflicts are more diffuse. Some readers find the philosophical passages on memory and ageing slow. These are worth knowing before starting, though they are unlikely to diminish the experience for the readers the book is written for.
Who This Is For
Readers who have completed Red Mars and Green Mars — the trilogy’s conclusion and resolution.
Our rating: 4.2/5 — A thoughtful, philosophically rich conclusion to the best hard SF trilogy of its era.
Reading Guides
Trilogy Completion and Award History
Blue Mars was published in 1996 as the third and final volume of Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars Trilogy (Red Mars, 1992; Green Mars, 1993). The trilogy is unique in science fiction in having won major awards for all three volumes: Red Mars won the Nebula Award for Best Novel in 1993; Green Mars won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1994; Blue Mars won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1997 and was also a nominee for the Nebula.
The novel covers approximately the final decades of the 21st century, as Mars — now partially terraformed with liquid water, breathable air in the lowlands, and a growing population — confronts the political question of independence from Earth and integration into a broader solar system economy. The original First Hundred, including Ann Clayborne (the leading Red, opposed to terraforming), Sax Russell (the leading terraformer), and Nadia Chernevsky, are now very old, sustained by longevity treatments that Robinson developed over the trilogy as a plausible near-future technology.
Robinson’s Mars Trilogy is the most scientifically grounded and politically ambitious planetary colonization narrative in science fiction; the author worked with scientists and drew on real proposals for Martian terraforming in developing the trilogy’s environmental scenarios. The Blue in the title refers to Earth-like conditions achieved on the planet’s surface: the red Mars of bare rock, the green Mars of initial terraforming, and the blue Mars of standing water and open sky. The trilogy has been credited with influencing actual Mars exploration discussion at NASA and in the wider planetary science community.
The Hugo Award
Blue Mars won the Hugo Award for Best Novel in 1997, completing an extraordinary achievement: Red Mars (1993) won the Nebula, and Green Mars (1994) won the Hugo, with Blue Mars winning the Hugo in its turn. The Mars Trilogy is the only series in which every volume won a major award — an acknowledgement by the science fiction community that Robinson had sustained his ambition and his quality across nearly 1,800 pages of dense, research-intensive fiction. The third novel closes the trilogy’s multi-century arc with the first generation of Martian-born colonists, who have no memory of Earth and no meaningful relationship to the conflicts that shaped the previous generations.
The novel closes the trilogy’s 2,000-year arc with the “Long Defeat” — the gradual loss of Mars’s wildness to human habitation — a conclusion Robinson described as his most honest statement about the relationship between idealism and time.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Blue Mars" about?
The conclusion of Robinson's Mars trilogy — Mars is now green and blue, the terraforming essentially complete. The political, ecological, and personal questions opened by Red Mars and Green Mars are resolved, as the original colonists age and the generation they created comes into its own.
Who should read "Blue Mars"?
Readers who have completed Red Mars and Green Mars — the trilogy's conclusion and resolution.
What are the key takeaways from "Blue Mars"?
Terraforming raises unanswerable political questions — who owns a planet, and who has the right to transform it Longevity beyond a few centuries produces psychological fragmentation — the self cannot hold that much time coherently The green and red Mars factions represent a genuine conflict between ecological preservation and human expansion that has no clean resolution
Is "Blue Mars" worth reading?
The third volume of the best hard science fiction trilogy of the twentieth century — less propulsive than Red Mars but richer in its political and philosophical payoff. The treatment of extreme longevity and its psychological effects is the trilogy's most unexpected achievement.
Ready to Read Blue Mars?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: