Editors Reads Verdict
Grant's breakthrough book introduced a framework for success that prioritizes generosity over self-interest — the research is compelling and the distinction between givers, takers, and matchers remains one of organizational psychology's most useful typologies.
What We Loved
- The giver-taker-matcher typology is immediately recognizable and practically useful
- Research examples span architecture, medicine, finance, and academia convincingly
- The distinction between successful and unsuccessful givers is nuanced and important
- The book challenges the cynicism that treating business as zero-sum requires
Minor Drawbacks
- Some case studies are drawn from unusually high-achieving populations
- The otherish giver concept needed more development
- A few chapters feel like extended magazine articles rather than integrated argument
Key Takeaways
- → Givers occupy both the bottom and top of success distributions — the difference is self-protection
- → Takers are identified by their behavior patterns, not their stated values
- → Matchers maintain a careful balance of equity that limits their generosity and their success
- → The most successful givers are 'otherish' — generous but not self-sacrificing
- → Networks built on genuine giving are more durable than those built on strategic exchange
| Author | Adam Grant |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Viking |
| Pages | 307 |
| Published | April 9, 2013 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Business, Psychology |
| Difficulty | Beginner |
| Best For | Business professionals, leaders, and anyone interested in the psychology of success, reciprocity, and what separates effective generosity from self-defeating altruism. |
The Counterintuitive Success Strategy
The conventional wisdom about professional success — work hard, promote yourself, protect your interests, be strategic about who you help — is not wrong exactly, but it’s incomplete. Adam Grant’s first book is built on a single research finding that complicates the conventional story: the people at the bottom of success distributions in most fields tend to be generous givers, and so do the people at the top.
The difference between unsuccessful givers and successful ones is the book’s real subject.
Givers, Takers, and Matchers
Grant’s three-way typology has become one of organizational psychology’s most widely used frameworks. Takers prioritize their own interests and treat relationships as resources to extract value from. Matchers maintain careful reciprocity — they help when they expect equivalent help in return. Givers contribute without keeping score, motivated by genuine interest in others’ success.
The counterintuitive finding is that these types don’t form a simple hierarchy. Takers and matchers cluster in the middle of success distributions. Givers appear at both extremes — some are the most successful people in their fields, others are the least successful. The question is what distinguishes the two groups of givers.
The Otherish Giver
Grant’s answer is the concept of the “otherish” giver: someone who is genuinely generous but who maintains sufficient self-interest to prevent exploitation. Successful givers are not doormats. They recognize takers and adjust their behavior accordingly. They give in high-leverage ways — teaching, mentoring, connecting — rather than absorbing the most tedious requests. They give primarily to people who are receptive rather than to those who will extract indefinitely.
The failed givers are often the most visibly selfless — they say yes to everything, prioritize everyone else’s needs over their own, and burn out. The successful givers have developed the wisdom to be selective.
The Network Implications
Grant’s chapters on networking are the book’s most practically useful. Givers build networks based on genuine interest in others, which means their networks trust them. When they need help, they receive it from people who believe in their good faith — because the evidence for that good faith is extensive. Takers build networks based on perceived utility, which means their networks abandon them when their status declines.
Our rating: 4.2/5 — A research-grounded, accessible examination of how generosity functions in professional life, built on a typology that remains one of organizational psychology’s most useful contributions.
Ready to Read Give and Take?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: