Editors Reads Verdict
Süskind's one major novel is a tour de force of sensory writing and psychological horror — a picaresque set in the stinking eighteenth century that builds to one of literature's most deranged and transcendent endings. Grotesque, beautiful, and utterly singular.
What We Loved
- The sensory rendering of eighteenth-century Paris — especially smell — is one of literature's great technical achievements
- Jean-Baptiste Grenouille is one of fiction's most compelling monsters — comprehensible without being sympathetic
- The ending is genuinely shocking and somehow earned by everything that precedes it
- The novel does something essentially unrepeatable — olfactory fiction is almost impossible, and Süskind pulled it off
Minor Drawbacks
- The protagonist's complete absence of empathy makes the novel cold and sometimes oppressive to inhabit
- The episodic picaresque structure means the middle section meanders somewhat
- Some readers find the novel's relationship to misogyny (the victims are all young women) troubling rather than deliberately interrogated
Key Takeaways
- → Genius without empathy or social connection produces something that looks less like success than monstrosity
- → The desire to be loved — to make others feel what you have never felt — is one of the most dangerous human hungers
- → Eighteenth-century Paris was a world primarily experienced through smell, not sight
- → Perfume as art form raises the same questions as any art form: what is it for, and for whom
- → The acquisition of everything you have ever wanted can produce something other than satisfaction
| Author | Patrick Süskind |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Vintage |
| Pages | 263 |
| Published | January 1, 1985 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Historical Fiction, Thriller |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Literary fiction readers who want something entirely singular; those interested in the historical perfume trade; readers willing to sit with an utterly amoral protagonist. |
How Perfume: The Story of a Murderer Compares
Perfume: The Story of a Murderer at a glance against 3 similar books readers weigh alongside it.
| Book | Author | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfume: The Story of a Murderer (this book) | Patrick Süskind | ★ 4.3 | Literary fiction readers who want something entirely singular |
| The Little Prince | Antoine de Saint-Exupéry | ★ 4.7 | Everyone — children who will understand it differently than adults, adults who |
| The Shadow of the Wind | Carlos Ruiz Zafón | ★ 4.6 | Literary fiction readers who love books about books |
| The Stranger | Albert Camus | ★ 4.5 | Readers interested in existentialist and absurdist philosophy — and anyone who |
An Olfactory World
Patrick Süskind’s achievement in Perfume is almost purely technical before it is anything else: he has written a novel centered on the sense of smell in a literary tradition that overwhelmingly privileges sight and sound. The opening chapters of the novel — describing the extraordinary stench of eighteenth-century Paris, the hierarchy of smells in the city, the way smell organized social life in ways contemporary readers have entirely forgotten — are among the most remarkable feats of sensory rendering in world literature.
Jean-Baptiste Grenouille is born in 1738 at a Paris fish stall, under a pile of offal, to a mother who immediately tries to abandon him. He survives. He has no personal odor — none whatsoever — but the most extraordinary sense of smell in the world. He can identify every component of any scent, can navigate entirely by smell, can process olfactory information with a precision no human being has possessed before him. And he is utterly devoid of empathy, compassion, or any human feeling beyond the obsessive desire to create the perfect scent.
The Monster’s Logic
What makes Perfume work as more than a grotesque curiosity is the internal coherence of Grenouille’s psychology. His monstrousness is not random or inexplicable but the logical product of his specific gifts and deficits: he perceives the world with extraordinary richness through smell and cannot perceive other people as anything other than sources of scent. His victims are not people to him but olfactory objects. This is horrifying and is made comprehensible — not sympathetic, but comprehensible — through Süskind’s rigorous insistence on inhabiting Grenouille’s perspective.
The Ending
The novel’s ending — which it would be unfair to describe — is one of literature’s most audacious and strange conclusions. It is logically consistent with everything that has preceded it, it delivers on the novel’s accumulated strangeness with something approaching the transcendent, and it will stay with the reader indefinitely. This is what the novel has been building toward, and arriving there feels simultaneously inevitable and completely unexpected.
The Singular Achievement
Perfume is the kind of novel that could only have been written once by one person. Its combination of historical specificity, olfactory virtuosity, picaresque structure, and psychological horror is unrepeatable. Süskind never published another novel. This is the entirety of his legacy, and it is more than enough.
Smell as a Literary Frontier
The foundational achievement of Perfume is its conquest of a sense that literature had almost entirely neglected. Where novels overwhelmingly render the visible and the audible, Süskind builds an entire fictional world out of scent, and his eighteenth-century Paris is the most thoroughly smelled city in fiction — its reeking fish markets, its perfumed aristocrats, its layered stenches of tannery and cemetery and human body evoked with a precision that makes the reader’s own nose come alive. This is not mere description but a genuine reorganization of how the reader perceives the world of the book, a demonstration that smell, the most primal and least verbal of the senses, can be made the medium of literary art. Through Grenouille’s preternatural olfactory genius, Süskind maps a hierarchy of scents that once governed social life and that modern, deodorized readers have forgotten, recovering a lost sensory dimension of history. The feat is so complete that Perfume stands essentially alone, a novel that expanded the sensory vocabulary of fiction itself.
A Monster of Pure Logic
Jean-Baptiste Grenouille is one of literature’s most singular protagonists precisely because his monstrousness is rendered as the rigorous, comprehensible consequence of his nature rather than as inexplicable evil. Born with no scent of his own yet possessing the most acute sense of smell in the world, Grenouille perceives other human beings only as olfactory objects, sources of scent to be catalogued, harvested, and possessed; he is constitutionally incapable of experiencing them as people, and so his eventual murders follow from his psychology with a terrible internal consistency. Süskind’s accomplishment is to inhabit this alien perspective so completely that the reader understands Grenouille without ever sympathizing with him — he becomes comprehensible, which is far more unsettling than mere villainy. The obsession that drives him, the creation of the perfect scent distilled from beautiful young women, is presented not as sadism but as the logical extension of his genius and his emptiness. This fusion of the grotesque with airtight psychological coherence is what lifts the novel above mere horror into something stranger and more disturbing.
The Audacious Conclusion
The novel builds, with mounting strangeness, toward an ending that ranks among the most audacious in modern literature, and to which the entire book has been the careful preparation. Without disclosing its particulars, the conclusion delivers on the accumulated logic of Grenouille’s quest for the perfect scent and its power over human beings, arriving at a climax that is at once horrifying, blackly comic, and weirdly transcendent. It is the kind of ending that fully justifies the journey, transforming the picaresque tale of a scent-obsessed murderer into something approaching myth or fable, with a moral resonance that the reader does not see coming. Süskind risks everything on this final movement, and the gamble pays off precisely because the ending is the inevitable destination of everything that precedes it while remaining entirely surprising. It is an ending that lodges permanently in the memory, recasting the whole novel in its strange light and confirming that the book’s grotesquerie has been in service of a genuine and unexpected vision.
A Singular Legacy
Published in German in 1985 and translated into English to wide acclaim, Perfume: The Story of a Murderer became an international literary phenomenon, one of the best-selling German novels of the twentieth century and a fixture of the modern canon of strange, unclassifiable masterpieces. Patrick Süskind, famously reclusive, never published another novel of comparable ambition, so that this single book constitutes the bulk of his literary legacy — and it is more than enough. The novel’s unrepeatable combination of historical specificity, olfactory virtuosity, picaresque energy, and psychological horror has ensured its enduring readership and influence, and it was adapted into a striking 2006 film that nonetheless could not fully capture the sensory effects that exist only on the page. It remains the kind of book that could have been written only once, by one person, a work whose originality is so total that it has spawned admirers but no true imitators. For readers seeking something genuinely unlike anything else, Perfume is essential.
Our rating: 4.3/5 — A technically astonishing and utterly singular novel whose olfactory world-building is unlike anything else in literature, built around a monster of perfect internal coherence and an ending of genuine audacity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Perfume: The Story of a Murderer" about?
An eighteenth-century Paris parfumeur with an extraordinary sense of smell and no odor of his own commits a series of murders to create the world's most perfect perfume.
Who should read "Perfume: The Story of a Murderer"?
Literary fiction readers who want something entirely singular; those interested in the historical perfume trade; readers willing to sit with an utterly amoral protagonist.
What are the key takeaways from "Perfume: The Story of a Murderer"?
Genius without empathy or social connection produces something that looks less like success than monstrosity The desire to be loved — to make others feel what you have never felt — is one of the most dangerous human hungers Eighteenth-century Paris was a world primarily experienced through smell, not sight Perfume as art form raises the same questions as any art form: what is it for, and for whom The acquisition of everything you have ever wanted can produce something other than satisfaction
Is "Perfume: The Story of a Murderer" worth reading?
Süskind's one major novel is a tour de force of sensory writing and psychological horror — a picaresque set in the stinking eighteenth century that builds to one of literature's most deranged and transcendent endings. Grotesque, beautiful, and utterly singular.
Ready to Read Perfume: The Story of a Murderer?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: