Editors Reads Verdict
The most analysed work in the English language — and it justifies every word of that analysis. Hamlet's interior life is more vivid than almost any character in subsequent literature, his dilemmas more genuinely philosophical, his language more lastingly alive. It is the play by which all others are measured.
What We Loved
- The density of quotable language is unparalleled — Hamlet has given the English language hundreds of phrases
- Hamlet himself is a genuinely new kind of literary consciousness — inward, self-questioning, modern
- The ghost story frame is a vehicle for the deepest philosophical questions about action and mortality
- Every major character has an interior logic that rewards close attention
Minor Drawbacks
- The play's length and complexity can be daunting in first encounter
- Performance choices significantly shape experience — a weak Hamlet can make the play feel merely long
- The subplot involving Fortinbras is often cut in performance and can feel distant on the page
Key Takeaways
- → Consciousness itself — the ability to reflect on one's own situation — is what creates Hamlet's paralysis
- → The ghost represents the past's claim on the present — the demand that old wrongs be avenged rather than integrated
- → Acting requires a willingness to be wrong; Hamlet's desire for certainty is incompatible with action
- → The play-within-the-play is Shakespeare's most sophisticated statement about theatre's power to reveal truth
- → Death is the one certainty that equalises all — the graveyard scene is Western literature's central memento mori
| Author | William Shakespeare |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Simon & Schuster |
| Pages | 342 |
| Published | January 1, 1603 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Fiction, Classic Literature, Drama |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Every reader and theatregoer — Hamlet is the central work of English literature and the best introduction to what Shakespeare's language can do at full power. |
The Central Work of English Literature
Hamlet was written around 1600-1601, in the middle of Shakespeare’s creative life, and it is the work that separates his early period — the histories, the comedies, the early tragedies — from the great tragedies that followed: Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. It is as if, writing Hamlet, Shakespeare discovered a new kind of interiority, a new way of rendering consciousness on the stage, that changed what he — and what the theatre — could do.
Prince Hamlet of Denmark returns from university at Wittenberg to find his father dead and his mother married to his uncle Claudius, who has assumed the throne. A ghost in his father’s shape reveals that Claudius murdered him. Hamlet is commanded to revenge — and then does almost everything except revenge, for the length of the longest play in the canon.
”To Be or Not to Be”
The most famous soliloquy in English — and arguably in world literature — is Hamlet’s meditation on suicide and endurance, delivered in Act 3. “To be or not to be, that is the question” — the question is not merely whether to kill himself but whether to act at all, whether consciousness itself is a burden that makes action impossible. The “undiscovered country” from whose bourn no traveller returns is not just death but the unknown consequences of action: you cannot know what you are doing until it is too late to undo it.
This paralysis is not weakness but a form of philosophical honesty. Hamlet knows too much to act blindly. He requires certainty that is not available. His problem is a version of every thinking person’s problem: that reflection and action are in tension, that consciousness creates complexity where decisiveness requires simplicity.
The Language
Shakespeare gave Hamlet the most extraordinary language he ever wrote for a single character. “What a piece of work is a man!” “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” “This above all: to thine own self be true.” “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” “The rest is silence.” These phrases are not decorative but structurally essential — each one advances Hamlet’s thinking and the play’s argument simultaneously.
The density and speed of Hamlet’s mind — the puns, the digressions, the sudden lurches from comedy to philosophy to cruelty — is the best evidence for the claim that Shakespeare invented, or at least first fully rendered, modern psychological interiority.
Claudius and the State
The play’s political dimension — the rotten state of Denmark, the corruption that flows from a usurped throne — is sometimes overshadowed by its psychological richness, but it is equally important. Claudius is a more interesting villain than his reputation suggests: intelligent, genuinely in love with Gertrude, capable of remorse (his prayer scene is one of the play’s most complex passages), and ultimately unable to give up what his crime purchased.
Our rating: 4.9/5 — The central work of English literature; every reading reveals new dimensions, every production offers new possibilities.
Ready to Read Hamlet?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: