Editors Reads Verdict
Martin took the political realism of history — the Wars of the Roses, Byzantine court intrigue, the actual brutality of medieval warfare — and injected it into fantasy. The result changed genre fiction permanently. No moral safety nets, no guaranteed survival of the protagonist, no simple good versus evil. Brilliant and brutal in equal measure.
What We Loved
- Political intrigue that rivals the best historical fiction — Machiavellian without the simplification
- No character is safe — the tension is genuine because the rules of genre protection don't apply
- Multiple POV chapters give every faction its own logic and motivation — no pure villains
- The world-building is extraordinarily detailed — 8,000 years of Westerosi history underpin every scene
- The HBO series' first season follows the book almost scene-for-scene — read first for maximum impact
Minor Drawbacks
- 700+ pages with a large cast — the first hundred pages require active map-consulting
- The series remains unfinished — GRRM has not published a new volume since 2011
- Some readers find the violence and sexual content gratuitous rather than purposeful
- The TV series diverges badly after Season 4 — the book and the show are now very different beasts
Key Takeaways
- → When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die — power has no neutrality
- → Honour and political survival are almost always in conflict — Ned Stark's arc is the thesis
- → POV determines everything — every character is the hero of their own story
- → Winter is always coming — existential threats are ignored when factions are consumed by internal conflict
- → The 'good guys' are defined by how much they care about the innocent, not by how much power they want
| Author | George R.R. Martin |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Bantam Books |
| Pages | 694 |
| Published | August 1, 1996 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Fantasy, Fiction, Political Fiction |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Fantasy readers wanting political complexity, fans of HBO's Game of Thrones who haven't read the source material, readers of historical fiction, and anyone who wants their genre fiction without moral safety nets. |
Fantasy Without Safety Nets
Before A Game of Thrones, fantasy had conventions. The hero’s journey had predictable beats. Protagonists survived. Good triumphed. Evil was recognisable.
George R.R. Martin destroyed those conventions.
When A Game of Thrones was published in 1996, it was immediately recognised as something different: a fantasy novel using the actual rules of history — treachery, political murder, the random cruelty of war — rather than the comforting rules of genre. The result is a reading experience unlike anything fantasy had produced before it.
The World
Westeros is a continent slightly larger than South America, with eight thousand years of recorded history and a climate system where summers and winters can last for years or decades. Martin based it on medieval England — specifically the Wars of the Roses — with the geography of Britain rotated 90 degrees.
The detail is staggering. The history of every Great House, the lineages of every king, the religions and cultures of every region — Martin had been building this world since the early 1990s. The HBO series Game of Thrones brought it to a global audience; the books contain depths the series never had time to explore.
The Story
The novel follows multiple storylines simultaneously, told through rotating POV chapters:
Ned Stark — Lord of Winterfell, Warden of the North — is appointed Hand of the King by his old friend Robert Baratheon. He goes south to King’s Landing and discovers the court is a labyrinth of lies where he is completely out of his depth.
Catelyn Stark — Ned’s wife — receives information suggesting the previous Hand’s murder was engineered by the Lannisters, setting events in motion that fracture the kingdom.
Daenerys Targaryen — exiled princess of the deposed royal family — is sold in marriage to a Dothraki warlord and must survive long enough to potentially reclaim her throne.
Tyrion Lannister — the wily, wine-loving dwarf of the most powerful family in Westeros — navigates his family’s schemes while pursuing his own agenda.
And beyond the great Wall at the northern edge of the world: something ancient and malevolent is stirring in the long winter.
What Martin Got Right
The genius of A Game of Thrones is its moral complexity. Every faction has a coherent worldview and legitimate grievances. The Lannisters are ruthless, but they are protecting their family. Ned Stark is honourable, but his honour gets people killed. Daenerys wants justice, but “justice” means different things depending on which side of history you’re on.
Martin was explicitly writing against the Tolkien tradition of clear moral alignment. Tolkien’s orcs are irredeemably evil; Martin’s “villains” are people acting in their self-interest with the logic that history actually runs on.
The other innovation: no character is safe. Martin kills characters the reader expects to be the protagonist. This creates genuine tension — you cannot predict who will survive because the usual rules don’t apply.
The Unfinished Series Problem
The honest caveat: A Song of Ice and Fire remains unfinished. The Winds of Winter (Book 6) has not been published as of 2026. Martin began this series in 1991 and has been working on it for over three decades.
The first five books are nonetheless complete narratives. A Game of Thrones in particular is a perfect novel in its own right — the setup, the political education, the devastating conclusion all resolve within the book’s own terms.
Read it for itself, not for the resolution of the overarching series.
Our rating: 4.7/5 — The novel that changed fantasy fiction. Essential reading regardless of the unfinished series.
Ready to Read A Game of Thrones?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: